RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID

ietf-mxcomp

2004-09-02 14:05:50


On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 terry(_at_)ashtonwoodshomes(_dot_)com wrote:

[If the IETF were to abandon it]
SenderID will die.  It's a good technical solution for today.


So is SPF Classic, but without encumberances.


And which solves a different problem.

-Rand

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, (continued) Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Jonathan Gardner RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Dean Anderson RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Ken RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Ken Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Peter Bowyer RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Michel Bouissou RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, terry RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Rand Wacker <= Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Harold A'Hole Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, mazieres Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, James Couzens Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Sam Varshavchik Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, David H. Lynch Jr. Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Sam Varshavchik RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Harry Katz Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Yakov Shafranovich Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Chuck Mead

Previous by Date:	RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID, Douglas Otis
Next by Date:	In support of SenderID, Craig Taylor
Previous by Thread:	RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID, terry
Next by Thread:	Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]