-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 2:27 PM
To: 'Michel Bouissou'; ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID
Michel:
I'd say a more precise interpretation of the extracted sentences would
be:
"Think about the consequences of our actions. Imagine what the world
will be like following a MARID abandonment of SenderID?" You do not
have to be assimilated, but it seems unrealistic to believe that
SenderID will die. It's a good technical solution for today.
So is SPF Classic, but without encumberances.
Terry Fielder
Manager Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Fax: (416) 441-9085
--KEN
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Michel Bouissou
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:19 AM
To: ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Motion to abandon Sender ID
Ken a écrit :
I encourage the MARID working group, it's Chairs and the IETF to
embrace SenderID and help to promote it as a standard.
[...]
If the MARID chairs abandon SenderID, SenderID will not die.
Microsoft will move forward with SenderID at MSN, HotMail, within
Outlook and Exchange. SendMail will move forward with
SenderID. [...]
What I read above is "Resistance is futile. You will be
assimilated.", or am I mistaken ?
Is it really the role of IETF to "follow what BigCompany
decides, because they'll do it anyway" ?
--
Michel Bouissou <michel(_at_)bouissou(_dot_)net> OpenPGP ID 0xDDE8AC6E