Re: If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID)

ietf-mxcomp

2004-09-03 14:41:19



On Sep 3, 2004, at 5:13 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:

So I wonder whether this would be useful data.

At this point, what is most useful is the reason inhibiting deployment.And many people have been quite clear about that.


-andy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Re: If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID), Andrew Newton <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Douglas Otis
Next by Date:	Re: X-header for forwarding MTAs, Yakov Shafranovich
Previous by Thread:	If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Next by Thread:	Extension of Sender ID working group last call, Andrew Newton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]