ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: consensus call on MUST/SHOULD language for TXT records

2004-09-05 00:25:15

Andrew,

AN> 1) Specify everyone to be compliant at all times.
AN> 2) Specify clearly full complaint state and tolerate non-compliant
AN> state during phase-in.


 The concept of "phase-in" for Internet services -- especially ones
 that modify mission-critical, established services -- is measure in
 5-10 year increments.

 For the purposes of IETF standards specification and -- even more
 importantly -- for operations planning, this is the same as saying
 "forever".

 So, the accurate semantics of the choices are:

 1) Specify everyone to be compliant at all times
 2) Specify clearly full compliant state, but tolerate non-compliance
 forever

 The second choice does, of course, lead the a small question: why
 bother with the concept of compliance?


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>