Re: consensus call on MUST/SHOULD language for TXT records2004-09-07 14:46:12On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 14:33, Andrew Newton wrote: Despite lack of agreement on the outcome, there is agreement on the stated positions. In the words of Olafur: 1) Specify everyone to be compliant at all times. 2) Specify clearly full complaint state and tolerate non-compliant state during phase-in. My vote is for 1. I believe allowing non-compliance is an invitation for non-compliance. -- HELO, my name is root... you have SIGKILLed my father... prepare to vi!
|
|