I guess technically since the drafts have the writers' names rather than
then working group name they are not implied to be ietf WG documents.
-Tom
thomasgal(_at_)lumenvox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Harry
Katz
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:49 AM
To: Dean Anderson
Cc: IETF MARID WG
Subject: RE: Status of MARID WG?
To my knowledge, MARID has not started again.
I was just using the list to provide members with copies of
the specifications since they will not appear on the IETF web
site until after the IETF 61 meeting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Anderson [mailto:dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 7:31 PM
To: Harry Katz
Cc: IETF MARID WG
Subject: Status of MARID WG?
Unless I missed something, the MARID working group is
shutdown, so it
can no longer consider drafts. It was my understanding that
this list
was kept active for discussion only. Did the MARID WG
start up again?
--Dean
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Harry Katz wrote:
The attached Sender ID specification,
draft-lyon-senderid-pra-00, is
being submitted to the IETF as an experimental Internet
draft along
with draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 and draft-katz-submitter-00.
These three drafts capture discussions held during the last
few weeks
of the MARID working group, as well as some subsequent
feedback we've
received. In summary, we've made two key changes to the Sender ID
Framework:
--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000