RE: Status of MARID WG?
2004-11-04 15:45:17
The practical difference is not that important.
There are many RFCs that have reached draft standard status that have never
been deployed. There are many protocols that have never progressed beyond
experimental or informational that are real defacto standards.
It was abundantly clear than many in the group were working from a mental
model that went something like obtain IETF standards status, get deployed.
This is in practice only the way forward after a protocol is reasonably
mature. There is a high probability that the blogosphere will converge on
whatever ATOM decides, but the IETF could not have created the blogosphere
by simply ratifying an RFC.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Gal
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:21 PM
To: 'Harry Katz'; 'Dean Anderson'
Cc: 'IETF MARID WG'
Subject: RE: Status of MARID WG?
I guess technically since the drafts have the writers' names
rather than then working group name they are not implied to
be ietf WG documents.
-Tom
thomasgal(_at_)lumenvox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mxcomp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Harry
Katz
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:49 AM
To: Dean Anderson
Cc: IETF MARID WG
Subject: RE: Status of MARID WG?
To my knowledge, MARID has not started again.
I was just using the list to provide members with copies of
the specifications since they will not appear on the IETF web
site until after the IETF 61 meeting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Anderson [mailto:dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 7:31 PM
To: Harry Katz
Cc: IETF MARID WG
Subject: Status of MARID WG?
Unless I missed something, the MARID working group is
shutdown, so it
can no longer consider drafts. It was my understanding that
this list
was kept active for discussion only. Did the MARID WG
start up again?
--Dean
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Harry Katz wrote:
The attached Sender ID specification,
draft-lyon-senderid-pra-00, is
being submitted to the IETF as an experimental Internet
draft along
with draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 and draft-katz-submitter-00.
These three drafts capture discussions held during the last
few weeks
of the MARID working group, as well as some subsequent
feedback we've
received. In summary, we've made two key changes to the
Sender ID
Framework:
--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: Status of MARID WG?, Harry Katz
- RE: Status of MARID WG?, Thomas Gal
- RE: Status of MARID WG?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip <=
- RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Status of MARID WG?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
|
|
|