ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bounce handling

2004-12-08 18:14:14

On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 16:48 -0800, kent crispin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:27:22PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
I consider autoreplies (and especially bounces) with non-empty reverse-
path to be an attempted denial of service attack, because of the mail
loop they threaten.

How about an autoreply from majordomo, asking you to confirm your 
subscription request?

I'd probably include that, yes -- if responding to a request made by
email, it should go to the reverse-path of the incoming subscription
request, and should have an empty reverse-path if its own. 

This would would prevent the autoreplies from being accepted (and
broadcasted) by other mailing lists.

-- 
dwmw2