Re: So here it is one year later...

On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 18:23 -0800, Douglas Otis wrote:
> I should also note that BATV does not require any outside service to
> address abusive bounce messages.  Although SES is similar, it
> introduces some security concerns by way of its syntax.
The syntax of each can be treated as if it's entirely opaque, and SES
without any form of validation at the _receiving_ side is then
indistinguishable from BATV in all but cosmetics, surely?

What are the security concerns of which you speak?

-- 
dwmw2