Assar,
I think we should avoid ASN.1 encoding rules at all cost, BUT if we
are to do anything with a native X.509 cert...
CB
At 02:55 AM 8/29/97 +0200, Assar Westerlund wrote:
Charles Breed <cbreed(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com> writes:
The UserID field (currently a 255 charater octet string)
could handle other types, such as...
OpenPGPGenericName ::= CHOICE {
otherName [0] INSTANCE OF OTHER-NAME,
rfc822Name [1] 255 Octet String,
dNSName [2] IA5String,
x400Address [3] ORAddress,
directoryName [4] Name,
ediPartyName [5] EDIPartyName,
uniformResourceIdentifier [6] IA5String,
iPAddress [7] OCTET STRING,
registeredID [8] OBJECT IDENTIFIER }
Do you actually propose using an ASN.1-related format or did you just
happen to write it in this format?
/assar