At 7:56 AM -0400 9/19/97, Tony Mione wrote:
On Sep 18, 4:31pm, John W. Noerenberg wrote:
Subject: Charter submitted to IESG
July 1998: WG last call on both drafts for Proposed Standard,
^^^^
I count only one draft (OPEN-PGP key format and Or does this mean:
1) OPEN-PGP key formats
2) OPEN-PGP message specifications
(including RFC 2015 or its replacement).
...or
1) OPEN-PGP key format and message specification
2) RFC 2015 and/or replacement
If this is the case, should we not have 'review of RFC2015' somewhere
in the milestones?
Good point, Tony. The IESG has called me to task on it, too.
Here the revised milestones I offered for their discussion:
Our milestones outline the progress of two documents to Proposed Standard.
1) RFC covering PGP Key format and PGP Message format
2) PGP/MIME
So Steve's on the right track with the milestones, but this is what we're
after:
Oct 97 Submit Internet-Draft for PGP Key Format & Message Format
Oct 97 Submit revised PGP/MIME RFC
Mar 98 Issue WG Last Call for both documents
May 98 Submit PGP Key Format & Message Format Internet-Draft to IESG for
consideration as a Proposed Standard.
May 98 resubmit PGP/MIME Specification to IESG for consideration as a
Proposed Standard
July 1998: IETF last call for PGP Key Format & PGP Message Specification
July 1998: IETF last call for PGP/MIME (RFC 2015 or its replacement)
john noerenberg
jwn2(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com
pager: jwn2(_at_)pager(_dot_)qualcomm(_dot_)com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"Try designing one set of outfits for the Spice Girls and the
Chicago Symphony, and see if anyone is happy."
-- Steve Dorner, private email, 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------