Re: New Draft... going forward1997-10-21 01:13:46* Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: I hope that the next version of the OpenPGP draft says what is required, what is suggested, and what's completely optional. The phrase at the Should I? Suggestions? beginning of 3.1.1 of the OpenPGP draft seems wrong in that it says that you can follow RFC 2015 and carry either ASCII armor or binary data; however, RFC 2015 clearly says that you must use ASCII armor (in the second sentence of section 2 of that document). Fixed.
|
|