-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Alex Le Heux wrote:
In an ever faster changing world of computers regular users of PGP
seem to be very reluctant to change anything.
Securaty applications tend to encourage a conservative[1] viewpoint even
when the person is noramly quite open to cahnge. This is most likly a
good thing.
[...]
Of course there is a strong case for continuing support for AA
(backwards compatibility and all that), but the new standard should
not be based on it. It's ancient technology.
But as I understand this is _not_ a new standard. It is the documentation
of an existing standard. So it is neccery to retain backwards capasity
with pgp itself.
[1] Conservitive as meaning unwilling to change.
- --
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett. I do not reply to munged addresses.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNHd/D6QK0ynCmdStAQEWEAQAnf0PtjRRawDHmSzd/jh+KQ5cRu7HlpXP
OtNNoEXweqhGyTYCWh+PRgP+hdh86mOE+zGLjzk7fbyD19JENV9ju03YyyNlYH+A
oLEIJRCaE2K+UTwC7+6tyE9uPdiiDGDqTVAKmuq3xu6sK8OspeK4ZwEkCkmDhstu
OebaaRNMTOg=
=rdbI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----