-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Ian Grigg wrote:
[...]
6.2 - I know the inclusion of ROT-n started as a joke - but it's in
there! Eeeek!
I thought Jon was joking about these! Remove at once please!
Yes, there should be no weakness. I know ROT-n is a joke to some, but
if Caeser used it, then so can others. If a test case is needed, it
should be plain and open. Not that I think one is.
I too can see a need for something like ROT-n for testinng. As PGP is not
just an encytion system but also has key manigment, signing ascii armore
ect it would be usefull to be able to sepreate off one part of the system
with know working code.
- --
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett. I do not reply to munged addresses.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNHeB/KQK0ynCmdStAQFrZQP/avok50mrjjFUcltV8lMTAPnRcE2Rxe/S
pebEWgX5Wd9Pf+gwLu4581ZAlWQ7eDLu6VtMFFw9J8rf2JBNvVEhIBBMW2O54bqC
j2kTDivKDZmiy9QgnOhmsrbzBFHiTxELfqDiF5p0uGhe1+4MPZ+5I4rf9aF2eBu9
RxZwSMt2nvM=
=3fO0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----