[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The case against redundancy and isolation

1997-11-24 11:58:26
At 02:56 PM 11/22/97 +0000, Ian Brown wrote:

   1. We should not MUST MIME *or* Armour. Both increase the amount of code
   needed for a minimal implementation, which none of us want. As Dave
   said, linearly increased code increases exponentially the potential for
   2. We are not trying to eliminate Armour. It is entirely appropriate
   that it should be in there as an option to provide backward
   compatibility, if implementors so wish.
   3. Both systems are for converting fully secure binary PGP data into a
   form which can be safely stored in/sent across 7-bit systems. Mail is
   such a system. Armour/MIME does nothing for security. As Dave and Jon
   have both said, OP is NOT a mail standard. It is a security standard.
   7-bit conversion should therefore not be a MUST. As Lindsay Mathieson
   said, we can safely assume most file systems can cope with 8-bit data.
Excellent statement, Ian. I can live with not MUSTing any of them.


Jon Callas                                  jon(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com
Chief Scientist                             555 Twin Dolphin Drive
Pretty Good Privacy, Inc.                   Suite 570
(415) 596-1960                              Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
              665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628           (RSA)