-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Adam Back writes:
Yes and no. Of course transparency will help. HOWEVER, many of PGP
users have either no time, or no skills (or "no" both) to modify
the software that interfaces between their favorite whatever
and PGP. For me it is Mailcrypt/XEmacs. Until *that* part
is taken care of - don't expect people to switch.
I think mailcrypt users are small in number. We should ask Pat
LoPresti if he wants to hack in pgp5.x support.
This is a project on my list. I use XEmacs and mailcrypt exclusively,
and want DSS/EG support fairly badly. If someone else gets to it
first, more power to them.
I plan to get to it sometime over the next month.
Regards,
Jeremey.
- --
Jeremey Barrett BlueMoney Software Corp.
Crypto, Ecash, Commerce Systems http://www.bluemoney.com/
PGP key fingerprint = 3B 42 1E D4 4B 17 0D 80 DC 59 6F 59 04 C3 83 64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBNHqXAy/fy+vkqMxNAQFNNQP8D5LqlB5Nq5mE6KlPSxXUruR8n5I2dLiJ
fYDvcXzPFvG81pKEc3VDJzQnQ9CpKFibPyZSrcdcEL2IQTbdg1jX5CyqfQNjxt3P
e8Bv6nUzkMEgjngVCxozhSJOQobe+A3D3p4mGNWXRR+5tHFAs1Hf4Thn7kT0AL9y
NcaUmEcQvTE=
=WXkk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----