Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP

> At the very least one would think that the US vendors would put thier
> crypto code in one DLL and document the API so someone overseas could
> replace it with somthing worth using. <sigh> I guess even that is too much
> to ask.
Was the topic of a discussion a few years ago about ITAR. The conclusion
was that adding "hooks" like that was right out.

Have the text in my office, think it was under "auxilliary devices" or
some such.

Anyone know if it is in the EAR ?

                                                Warmly,
                                                        Padgett