ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed Extensions to TLS for OpenPGP

1998-01-01 14:39:11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <199801012028(_dot_)MAA15455(_at_)itech(_dot_)terisa(_dot_)com>, on 01/01/98 
   at 03:29 PM, EKR <ekr(_at_)terisa(_dot_)com> said:

It seem that Fortify is a constructive proof that the program in question
violates this criterion. That doesn't mean it's
ineligible for CJ completely but I wouldn't want to try to get approval
for it either.

Personaly I think it would be a far better thing to allow *no* crypto
products be exported rather than the current government mandated
snake-oil.

FWIW: Most people I talk to that need the strong crypto version overseas
get it from replay.com :)

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                 
       
- ---------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBNKwNBI9Co1n+aLhhAQEungP8D8coWXBmAC25U8B4QeUxRc3jLWMGNxEP
YOCRkkmSJPumW18j5u5zMyrtYyjzm0OoudPzUFl8NpLaASHeRQPPUT/Ld9kUxe6T
VzANhfK2fqsGhxMhUkpNdSLxjxPB7glg+8MUJkA6tppo9GQ/gQclyFIqbVX6aqOX
I6uzBBw67Io=
=oEv8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>