Re the last call:
A few minor queries someone might like to comment on, this one I think
is still not resolved:
- Gary Howlands attack which can undetectably garble unsigned
encrypted messages ... has this was been fixed?
If not perhaps we could either fix it (include optional? unsigned
digest inside message) or have wording added to highlight that
unsigned encrypted messages offer little protection against garbling.
Also:
- Is it defined that an implementation would keep processing packets
until it gets to a terminal packet (terminal packets being
literal packets, or the text of a clear signed message)?
This is important as it allows super-encryption, and allows
encrypted messages to contain clear signed messages (which William
Geiger uses) plus it would be useful for experimental combinations
people may use.
Adam