Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats

On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, John  W. Noerenberg wrote:

> It sounds like -05 is the rev we take to the IESG.
Agreed.  I haven't been following the details of many of the more
technical issues on here lately, but the general flow lately has seemed to
be, "This is wrong, this other thing is the correct version"  And then Jon
replying with, "Yes, that's better"


Just my view of the status of things,


Ryan Anderson 
PGP fp: 7E 8E C6 54 96 AC D9 57  E4 F8 AE 9C 10 7E 78 C9