IETF OpenPGP (date)

June 30, 1998

Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), dontspam-tzeruch, 19:57
Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Paul Lambert, 19:03
Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Uri Blumenthal, 18:07
Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, dontspam-tzeruch, 16:48
Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Uri Blumenthal, 15:52
Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, dontspam-tzeruch, 15:11
Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Uri Blumenthal, 14:24
Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Uri Blumenthal, 14:15
Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Uri Blumenthal, 09:16
Re: What is MAY NOT, Jon Callas, 09:03
Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 08:38
Re: What is MAY NOT, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 08:31
What is MAY NOT, Werner Koch, 06:27
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch, 00:13

June 29, 1998

Re: areas of spec incomplete? (Re: Question and note), dontspam-tzeruch, 20:24
undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Adam Back, 19:18
stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Adam Back, 19:18
Re: Question and note, Jon Callas, 18:45
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 18:26
Re: Question and note, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 18:25
Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 18:18
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 17:38
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 17:30
areas of spec incomplete? (Re: Question and note), Adam Back, 17:27
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Jon Callas, 17:17
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 17:03
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 15:36
Re: Question and note, Tim Hudson, 15:32
Re: Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 15:23
Re: Question and note, Jon Callas, 14:31
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 12:52
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 11:31
MAY use X where X is variable or undefined..., dontspam-tzeruch, 11:11
Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 10:18
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 09:22
Re: Question and note, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 07:59
Re: Secret Key Packet III, Christoph Moser, 06:46
Secret Key Packets III, Christoph Moser, 06:32
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch, 03:43
Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Lutz Donnerhacke, 02:17
Re: Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 02:09
128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch, 01:43

June 28, 1998

Secret Key Packets II, Christoph Moser, 23:53
Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 22:14
Re: Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 20:30
preventing Gary Howland's attack, Adam Back, 15:48

June 26, 1998

Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 14:06
Re: Secret Key Packets, William H. Geiger III, 06:03
Secret Key Packets, Christoph Moser, 04:03

June 25, 1998

Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, Jon Callas, 18:06
Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, Ryan Anderson, 16:11
Re: Question and note, Jon Callas, 16:06
Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, Adam Back, 15:50
WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, John W. Noerenberg, 14:16

June 24, 1998

Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 14:05
Additions to draft, Jon Callas, 11:07

June 22, 1998

Re: More Typos, Jon Callas, 15:11
Re: Problem with Version 4 subpackets :(, Jon Callas, 15:11
Re: Problem with Version 4 subpackets :(, Jon Callas, 11:10

June 18, 1998

Re: Minor typo in 11.2, Jon Callas, 07:56
More Typos, Noah Salzman, 07:51
Problem with Version 4 subpackets :(, William H. Geiger III, 00:55

June 17, 1998

Another typo, Jon Callas, 16:47
Minor typo in 11.2, dontspam-tzeruch, 14:50
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-05.txt, Internet-Drafts, 06:17

June 16, 1998

Re: Changing HAVAL definition., Hal Finney, 14:55
Re: Changing HAVAL definition., Werner Koch, 12:27
Re: Changing HAVAL definition., dontspam-tzeruch, 11:58
Changing HAVAL definition., Jon Callas, 10:23

June 15, 1998

Re: Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, Michael Baumer, 23:40
Re: Another draft coming your way., Hal Finney, 17:06
Relevant diffs between -04 and -05, Jon Callas, 16:15
Another draft coming your way., Jon Callas, 15:43
Re: Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, William H. Geiger III, 08:41
Re: Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, Michael Baumer, 08:21
Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, William H. Geiger III, 07:43

June 12, 1998

List of PGP Public Keyservers, William H. Geiger III, 12:39

June 11, 1998

Re: Armor Headers in 04, Hal Finney, 09:34

June 10, 1998

[no subject], 3rstyhd, 18:15
Re: Armor Headers in 04, dontspam-tzeruch, 15:28
Re: Armor Headers in 04, Jon Callas, 13:05
Re: More (some already reported) spec nits, Jon Callas, 12:49

June 09, 1998

Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Ulf Möller, 11:57
Re: PGPticket, Tony Mione, 05:46

June 08, 1998

OFF TOPIC: PGP Plug In for Outlook Express, Domenico Rotondi, 11:31
Re: PGPticket, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 10:01
Re: PGPticket, Bill Stewart, 09:30

June 07, 1998

Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Bill Stewart, 01:33

June 05, 1998

Armor Headers in 04, Lutz Donnerhacke, 02:58

June 04, 1998

Minor updates to opgp & palmopgp, dontspam-tzeruch, 19:22
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Hal Finney, 12:08
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Philip Zimmermann, 11:30
Re: More (some already reported) spec nits, dontspam-tzeruch, 10:47
Re: More (some already reported) spec nits, Hal Finney, 08:57
More (some already reported) spec nits, dontspam-tzeruch, 08:08

June 03, 1998

Re: AGAIN: "Hash:" either SHOULD be used, or default to MD5, Jon Callas, 18:16
AGAIN: "Hash:" either SHOULD be used, or default to MD5, dontspam-tzeruch, 16:12
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07:21
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Ulf Möller, 04:54
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Werner Koch, 00:40

June 02, 1998

Re: PGP PKI? (Was: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP), Jon Callas, 19:20
PGP PKI? (Was: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP), William H. Geiger III, 17:12
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, dontspam-tzeruch, 15:14
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 14:49
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Philip Zimmermann, 14:33
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, David Hayes, 10:28
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, dontspam-tzeruch, 10:24
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Paul Koning, 10:17
Re: key revocation types (Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys), Jon Callas, 09:37
Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Jon Callas, 09:37
Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:45
Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Adam Back, 03:53
Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Adam Back, 03:53
key revocation types (Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys), Adam Back, 03:52
Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Werner Koch, 03:52
The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Philip Zimmermann, 01:18

June 01, 1998

Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), William H. Geiger III, 18:57
Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), William H. Geiger III, 18:57
PalmIII Progress: most things except compression work, dontspam-tzeruch, 17:28
Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Jon Callas, 14:29
Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Hal Finney, 14:13
implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Adam Back, 13:42
Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, dontspam-tzeruch, 12:49
Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Jon Callas, 11:31
Silence is Consent Dept., Jon Callas, 11:11
Re: Version 4 keystructure, Jon Callas, 10:48