Re: 128 bit block ciphers

ietf-openpgp

Re: 128 bit block ciphers

1998-06-30 00:13:46

dontspam-tzeruch(_at_)ceddec(_dot_)com writes:

This version or next version?  For this version I would leave a note that
the CFB is going to change as I noted above - as I pointed out, all
current algorithms happen to use 8 byte blocks.  The next version should
define this correctly though.  I think I can interoperate with everything


I agree with Tom, leave it as it is.  We can do these changes in the
next version.


Werner

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Lutz Donnerhacke Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Jon Callas Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch <= Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Adam Back Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Uri Blumenthal

Previous by Date:	Re: areas of spec incomplete? (Re: Question and note), dontspam-tzeruch
Next by Date:	What is MAY NOT, Werner Koch
Previous by Thread:	Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch
Next by Thread:	Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]