uri <uri(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> writes:
Werner Koch says:
However, to come to a solution we should use the
proposal and assign a new packet type to it (and add a version number
just in case we want to change it again).
If the above is the *plaintext* - I agree. I personally like
implicit IV=0x00...0 and the plaintext prepended with random
So do I, s/IV/random_bytes/
NO! With 128-bit cipher you MUST use 128-bit IV. [I understand it's
So we have to fix it in the RFC (I already implemented it this way).
Werner Koch at guug.de www.gnupg.org keyid 621CC013