At 12:26 PM -0700 4/22/1999, Werner Koch said:
I'll be ready by tomorrow. For now I also just append the 20 bytes
but I think it would make more sense to use a bignum.
I agree. It makes sense to make it be a bignum.
To be clear on this, what are you doing?
I presume that this is a V4 signature, with signature type of 0 (binary
document), PKALG of 0 (no public-key algorithm), hash algorithm type of the
appropriate hash, no subpackets, two hash bytes that duplicate the
high-order octets of the hash, and then a single MPI containing the hash.
Is this correct?