"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(_at_)openpgp(_dot_)net> writes:
I don't think that the X.509 packet alone should qualify as a valid
SelfSignature but instead during the conversion process a OpenPGP
We should not discuss the contents of private packets here. I mailed
this only as an explanation why we mighgt have those problems with the
signature packets. And becuase the public key algo 0 violates the
RFC, we should only dicusss, whether it might make sense to allow such
an extension.
--
Werner Koch at guug.de www.gnupg.org keyid 621CC013