Hello,
I couldn't find a specification for ElGamal signature values in the
RFC or the current (bis-02) draft, even though the current draft
mentions the possibility of such signatures in section 12.5 and gpg
seems to support them.
It would seem logical to use the same values as for public-key
encrypted session keys. Is that correct? Is that what gpg does or is
there something else I need to know?
If its just that I've been too dumb to find the right section in the
spec, pointers are very appreciated :)
Regards
--
Ingo Luetkebohle / ingo(_at_)blank(_dot_)pages(_dot_)de / 95428014
/
| Student of Computational Linguistics & Computer Science;
| Fargonauten.DE sysadmin; Gimp Registry maintainer;
| FP: 3187 4DEC 47E6 1B1E 6F4F 57D4 CD90 C164 34AD CE5B
pgpDKnAy2ei9s.pgp
Description: PGP signature