ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology

2001-09-05 08:50:53

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: "Florian Weimer" 
<Florian(_dot_)Weimer(_at_)RUS(_dot_)Uni-Stuttgart(_dot_)DE>
Jon Callas <jon(_at_)callas(_dot_)org> writes:
there, then they can't use algorithm 254. However, not only is using a
cipher algorithm deprecated, but our present max cipher number is 10.

This is not quite correct, the numbers 100 to 110 are already
assigned, too, technically speaking.  However, 254 was never an

But, as Jon pointed out, any use of a cipher algorithm number
here is deprecated.  In fact, the String-to-Key section has
the following commentary already.  Note the explicit mention of IDEA.

[2440bis-03, section 3.7.2.1]:
   This last possibility, the cipher algorithm number with an implicit
   use of MD5 and IDEA, is provided for backward compatibility; it MAY
   be understood, but SHOULD NOT be generated, and is deprecated.

I'd be perfectly happy strengthening this to "MUST NOT be generated
for algorithms outside the ranges 1-10 and 100-110" (or just IDEA).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3

iQEVAwUBO5ZGC2NDnIII+QUHAQGSxAf+P/ZbGOKHeRIXE/ikZq0SI5BNBvfTXta0
A8+MoeBRMvSyHWXz1csiaL/N9R/jsGAMlzjOYoTHRqi1ZvcRRaY2VrPoSyQfn+tF
k3V4EpsZq9b/dMtlPkHuuK5wx3kOhXQXSfciH+qZJl49MW/XBOTzKzQZFC98GRUu
hdZKkVGzEtUMlsnAB9JOaC5NmgCLSJi/rs/K81qsyvKXamazx5woqi+sCbI1XXyw
oJqkSIXKu+PfzbbIqe3fbemG9s/OrhZuEZucGWSEJG/GsCvjePEDZ1+VuGxCnUlp
zeHiDoovt5yC+n4WDq9H0sH9BmgHNh2rXA3G/fCMs/qBstrhh8Equg==
=1wOR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----