[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt

2002-08-12 10:26:13

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:07:27 +0200, Florian Weimer said:

IMHO, the draft does not specify the semantics of expiration in a way
which would warrant such statement.  I don't believe we can agree on a
specific set of expiration semantics even in the limited circle of

PNX (PGP is not X.509) ;-)

BTW, the referenced paper (
is definitely worth a read.

And the reason why Jon released the draft and sharped the MDC wording.

I see no more problem with the draft.  How lets try again to kick off
the the interop tests.