On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:07:27 +0200, Florian Weimer said:
IMHO, the draft does not specify the semantics of expiration in a way
which would warrant such statement. I don't believe we can agree on a
specific set of expiration semantics even in the limited circle of
PNX (PGP is not X.509) ;-)
BTW, the referenced paper (http://www.counterpane.com/pgp-attack.html)
is definitely worth a read.
And the reason why Jon released the draft and sharped the MDC wording.
I see no more problem with the draft. How lets try again to kick off
the the interop tests.