[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-06.txt

2002-08-12 10:23:29

On 8/12/02 7:07 AM, "Florian Weimer" 
<Weimer(_at_)CERT(_dot_)Uni-Stuttgart(_dot_)DE> wrote:

IMHO, the draft does not specify the semantics of expiration in a way
which would warrant such statement.  I don't believe we can agree on a
specific set of expiration semantics even in the limited circle of
this WG.

BTW, the referenced paper (
is definitely worth a read.

That particular change was correcting a typo in the previous draft. It has
nothing to do with the new paper.