On 8/12/02 7:07 AM, "Florian Weimer"
<Weimer(_at_)CERT(_dot_)Uni-Stuttgart(_dot_)DE> wrote:
IMHO, the draft does not specify the semantics of expiration in a way
which would warrant such statement. I don't believe we can agree on a
specific set of expiration semantics even in the limited circle of
this WG.
BTW, the referenced paper (http://www.counterpane.com/pgp-attack.html)
is definitely worth a read.
That particular change was correcting a typo in the previous draft. It has
nothing to do with the new paper.
Jon