now that sha-0 has been broken,
and sha-1 is actively being looked at for a possible extension of the
attack,
and MD5, HAVAL, and RIPEMD are also being attacked
http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/199.pdf)
would it be reasonable to re-accept the non-sha based hashes, (e.g. TIGER)
as a potential backup hash for implementations/users that may wish to
begin doing so?
vedaal
Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434
Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program:
http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427