On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:43:48 +0000, Ian G said:
But I think we need to hear from the PGP Inc and GPG
architects on this?
I recall that we tweaked gpg's behaviour in this regard until all
users were satisfied. Thus I'd say not to add new requirement to the
specs.
I agree. I think the spec is just fine in this regard: the final CRLF
(the one before the "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----") is not part of
the signature. That allows for the GPG behavior to preserve the
presence or lack of line ending on the last line.
David