Re: Ready for Camellia?

ietf-openpgp

2008-03-17 12:59:16


On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:23, dshaw(_at_)jabberwocky(_dot_)com said:

I would particulary appreciate comments on the choice of 128 and
256-bit keys (that is, lacking 192).  I tend to agree with Jon that


Drop Camellia-192.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG, (continued) Re: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG, David Shaw Re: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG, Derek Atkins Ready for Camellia? (was: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG), David Shaw Re: Ready for Camellia? (was: More on the closing of the OpenPGP WG), David Crick Re: Ready for Camellia?, Ian G Re: Ready for Camellia?, David Shaw Re: Ready for Camellia?, Jon Callas Re: Ready for Camellia?, David Shaw Re: Ready for Camellia?, Ian G Re: Ready for Camellia?, David Shaw Re: Ready for Camellia?, Werner Koch <=

Previous by Date:	Re: ECC in OpenPGP proposal, second revision, Ian G
Next by Date:	Re: Ready for Camellia?, David Shaw
Previous by Thread:	Re: Ready for Camellia?, David Shaw
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]