Re: [openpgp] Manifesto - who is the new OpenPGP for?

> FWIW: When I kicked of this thread I was not thinking of a "new OpenPGP"
> but of long planned extensions and updates to an existing protocol.
> Throwing everything over board and start from scratch should not be done
> under the label of OpenPGP;
I very much agree.  To be "OpenPGP" is to be at least *able* to be backwards 
compatible with the current OpenPGP.  Otherwise you are something new and 
other.
--
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp