On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
<calestyo(_at_)scientia(_dot_)net> wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 11:58 -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Look, my concern here is purely that I don't want to have to redo the
code I write this week because someone proposes this as an addition
later on.
I guess we're just at the start of the next standard,... writing code
now and assuming (and/or demanding) things to be stable is probably a
bad idea.
My concern is that when a nincompoop decided to release code
implementing the <img> tag in HTML he gave the community less than 16
hours to review before he had made it a fait accompli. As a result the
<img> tag still does not handle displays with resolutions other than
75dpi consistently twenty years later.
Once code ships it is very hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube.
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp