On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse> wrote:
On 6 May 2015, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
In 'under the covers' applications the user does not need to see, I
would hope we would support use of the 256 bit or full 512 bit
fingerprint.
Hm. Do you have a specific purpose for that in mind?
Any time someone is using a WF-256 bit key.
But also in the notary systems used for timestamping and such
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp