On Wed, 6 May 2015 20:12, cdl(_at_)asgaard(_dot_)org said:
Working Groups have a tendency to continue to exist past their
"use-by" date. As they do, the quality and velocity of their output
tends to decline. There are some counterexamples, but, unfortunately,
I understand.
more expansive, we can propose that for a charter, but the larger the
charter, the more "convincing" we need to do, especially if the
technology is mature like PGP is.
I am fine with
1) The primary charter goal would be create a RFC4880bis document.
a) At the end of that process, we would either re-charter, or close.
this.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp