Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-openpgp-01-00: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-openpgp/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is probably just a drafting issue, but this bit of the charter seems
too open-ended:
"- Other work may be entertained by the working group as long as it does
not interfere with the completion of the RFC4880 revision. As the
revision
of RFC4880 is the primary goal of the working group, other work may be
undertaken, so long as:
1. Will not unduly delay the closure of the working group after the
revision is finished (unless the working group is rechartered).
2. as widespread support in the working group."
It would be better IMO to characterize what this "other work" might
entail or relate to. It may be obvious to the proponents but for someone
who has not been following this it sounds like the WG could take up
pretty much anything beyond the 4880bis, time and interest permitting.
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp