Thinking this through a bit further.
Why is anyone going to move from SHA-2 to SHA-3 ? Only reason I can think
of is a real or perceived weakness in SHA-2.
That being so, I can't see why they would go for a lower number of
bits/rounds.
For OpenPGP, I think the case for 512 only or 256 and 512 is pretty strong.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer <
calestyo(_at_)scientia(_dot_)net> wrote:
On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 23:48 +0100, ianG wrote:
My "position" is only one hash, as many know well. I prefer the
longest, because they are computers and they don't have enough work
to
do.
If only one is to be assigned a number, it should be definitely the
longest.
Cheers,
Chris.
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp