Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis

On 06/27/2016 06:24 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in favor of accepting this.
>
> I'll also point out that I had made another suggested update on April 14
> (Subject: Proposed Patch to RFC4880bis to reserve two public key
> numbers) which has not been incorporated into the document.
There seems to be a lot of doubt about the security of Algebraic Eraser
protocols (at least controversy) and little research compared to other
key exchange methods,  without much gain from implementing it. What
would be the rationale for adding it?

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP certificate at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
Aurum est Potestas
Gold is power

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp