ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis

2016-06-27 14:40:06
The presence of an algorithm in the spec tends to create pressure on
implementations to support that algorithm.  When RFC2440 had reserved
entries for TIGER192, there was a small but vocal crowd in the GnuPG
community crying out, "we need TIGER192, it's in the spec!"  And as soon as
TIGER192 was removed, those voices died out -- because hey, it's no longer
in the spec.

Separating maintenance of the registry from the spec should address this, 
right? 

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>