On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:44:23PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
I remain wholly opposed to including OCB in the OpenPGP specification,
Do you prefer that we put a "2 - reserved for OCB" into the specs and
have an I-D to specify the oue of OCB in OpenPGP? This would make the
life for implementors and auditors harder.
Yes, I would much prefer that we let OCB happen in a separate draft.
Then all the patent problems occur in a separate specification that
doesn't affect the core OpenPGP.
--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp