Re: Proxylet API: IDL version

> By the way, your API set is not the "accepted standard" for OPES, as you
> know, but we publish it for information for interested parties.
Thankyou for clarifying that point.

As I have frequently stated its a starting point from which we can evolve an 
"accepted standard". I will continue to post information to further this work 
in an open forum. I look forward to constructive comments relating to the API 
in either its pure java or its idl form.

-Andy