Re: OPES protocol, additional message needed?

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Martin Stecher wrote:

> the progress parameter is not a must have core feature. As you
> described it will not be used in many cases. If there is a way to
> extend this later, fine.
>
> The probability parameter should go into the core.
>
> Do we now agree 100%?  ;-)
Yes. I will make necessary modifications.

Alex.