Re: FW: feedback: OCP version head_sid2 thread: Try 2

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> There are no OPES connections, but Hilarie is probably talking about
> OCP connections. Abbie suggests to rename OCP connections to
> "sessions". Which term would you prefer?
The protocol requirements draft only talks about "connections", and 
not about "sessions". Unless something different is refered to, I 
would suggest to stick with the terminology we've in the existing drafts.
Thanks,
  Markus