Re: draft-beck-opes-irml-03.txt

Folks,

we need to get going on the rules language as well, we're already late 
on this one!
There was only a single email from Alex coming back as response to the 
re-submitted IRML draft (draft-beck-opes-irml-03.txt). The intent has 
been to stimulate some discussions around this topic and to get 
started working on it...
Well, if there's nothing more to discuss and no one is coming up with 
modifications or alternatives to the approach presented in the IRML 
draft, maybe we should move forward with it and declare it a WG draft. 
If not, please engage on this mailing list and provide alternative 
thoughts and approaches.
We're aiming to submit an initial WG document on the rules language in 
August!
Thanks,
  Markus