Re: draft-beck-opes-irml-03.txt

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> [...]
>
> I doubt the above differences can be resolved by a compromise. One
> primary direction should be chosen by the working group. Am I the only
> person disliking the general direction of irml-03?
Folks, please post if you've an opinion on this matter, since we 
really need to decide what to do with the rules language, whether to 
adopt the IRML draft and keep working on it as WG draft, or whether 
someone is willing to commit writing an alternative approach.
-Markus