Yes, I also mentioned that proxylet is not discussed
for a long time. But what is the reason for this?
Is it related to system efficiency and simple
maintainance? I mean to setup one callout server is
easy to maintain and higher efficient to carry out
specific service than put them onto a single host.
--- Alex Rousskov <rousskov(_at_)measurement-factory(_dot_)com>
wrote: >
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, [iso-8859-1] Red K wrote:
It is an fresh man's topic. But I still want to
know if there is any
prototype OPES proxy that supports Proxylet Local
Execution
Environment Java Binding V0.1. Thus I can develope
my proxylet
because I am interested in OPES.
I am working on a prototype OPES proxy. It almost
talks OCP to a
prototype callout service being developed by Martin
Stecher. There is
no proxylet support. I heard proxylets were a
popular topic long time
ago, but there were no proxylets mentioned on this
list for quite a
while now. If you are interested in OPES, the
shortest path to a
working system may be to write a callout server that
speaks OCP. One
can write such a server in Java, of course.
HTH,
Alex.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Play now and stand a chance to win cash prizes!
http://yahoo.com.sg/millionaire