Re: is there OPES prototype proxy?

Red K wrote:

> Yes, I also mentioned that proxylet is not discussed
> for a long time. But what is the reason for this? 
Reason is that the OPES WG is chartered to specify the callout 
protocol and the rules language, but *not* a proxylet interface or a 
proxylet architecture - this would be a local implementation decision 
or standardized elsewhere.
The OPES architecture does *not* rule out proxylet, but the focus of 
the WG is on the callout mechanism.
-Markus