Folks,
if there is no interest to continue the work with a new charter, we
should withdraw our new charter proposal and close the WG.
If there's an interest to continue, we need a discussion on this list
to get the work going. AND - we need folks willing to put in the time
and effort to drive the work forward.
Thanks,
-Markus
Markus Hofmann wrote:
Folks,
we heard from Ted that our new charter proposal was discussed by the
IESG and no major concerns were raised. It went out for public review
and will get a second IESG review at the next telechat. Based on this,
let's get a discussion of the new (proposed) work items going on the
mailing list.
Tony suggested to have an ananalysis of "P" vs. "Sieve". Anyone any
thoughts or willing to take a first crack? Why do we need to invent a
new language when there's already a language that does very similar
things we want to do for email? Very valid question! [This hopefully
gets some folks rolling :]
We also need to get a discussion going on SMTP Use Cases - so please
post to the list of you've some thoughts on that!
Folks - it was quiet for a while. Now that we move forward with the new
work items, let's get the discussions going again. Only with active
participants it's worthwhile for us to continue!
-Markus