All,
I will not be attending this comming IETF. I can help with slides if needed.
Comapring sieve vs P is a good idea. However, the results should be compared
to a set of requirements.
This actually begs the question (that I have raised in the last meeting) do
we need a requirement document or not?
I will read Sieve over the weekend and I am looking forward to Alex
comaprisons.
Abbie
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-openproxy(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-openproxy(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Alex
Rousskov
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 12:14 AM
To: Markus Hofmann
Cc: OPES Group
Subject: Re: Another Update
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Markus Hofmann wrote:
if there is no interest to continue the work with a new charter, we
should withdraw our new charter proposal and close the WG.
If there's an interest to continue, we need a discussion on
this list
to get the work going. AND - we need folks willing to put
in the time
and effort to drive the work forward.
Markus,
I will review Sieve and do a P-versus-Sieve comparison,
hopefully by Tuesday. Since I am not attending IETF-wide
meetings, I do
not have strong preferences regarding the agenda.
Thanks,
Alex.